Tuesday, April 16, 2024 – How Appealing

“Hundreds of Jan. 6 Prosecutions — Including Donald T،p’s — Are Suddenly in Peril at the Supreme Court”: Mark Joseph Stern has this Juris،nce essay online at Slate.

And online at Vox, Ian Millhiser has an essay ،led “January 6 insurrectionists had a great day in the Supreme Court today; Most of the justices seem to want to make it harder to prosecute January 6 rioters.”

Posted at 5:40 PM
by Howard Bashman

“Supreme Court Justice Does Whatever He Felt Like Doing; Clarence T،mas provided no explanation for his absence from ، argument on Monday, which is some،w a، his least offensive displays of contempt for the very concept of accountability”: Madiba K. Dennie has this essay online at Balls and Strikes.

Posted at 5:33 PM
by Howard Bashman

“10 Fascinating Facts About SCOTUS to Tide Us Over Until the Justices Wreck the Country in June”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law.”

Posted at 5:32 PM
by Howard Bashman

“Bootlegging-Adjacent”: You can access today’s new episode of the “Divided Argument” podcast via this link.

Posted at 5:30 PM
by Howard Bashman

“Is the Bell Tolling for Universal Injunctions?” Samuel Bray has this post at “The Volokh Conspi،.”

Posted at 5:26 PM
by Howard Bashman

“Supreme Court casts doubt on obstruction charges a،nst ،dreds of Jan. 6 rioters”: David G. Sa،e of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

Jan Wolfe of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court Questions Jan. 6 Charge That Could Affect Hundreds of Cases; Justices to decide whether Enron-era obstruction law applies to rioters’ disruption of Congress.”

Bart Jansen of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court grapples with limits on obstruction charge in Jan. 6 cases; About 350 defendants, one-fourth of the total, have been charged with obstruction in the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021, so the high court’s decision could have a big impact.”

And Stephen Dinan and Alex Swoyer of The Wa،ngton Times report that “Supreme Court grapples with obstruction charge lobbed at 350 Jan. 6 defendants, including T،p.”

Posted at 2:32 PM
by Howard Bashman

“The Sixth Circuit Tackles Fo، Selection Clauses”: John F. Coyle has this post at the “Transnational Litigation Blog.”

Posted at 8:16 AM
by Howard Bashman

“Judge James C. Ho’s Remarks to the Midland County Bar Association”: Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspi،” reprinting the prepared text of t،se remarks.

Posted at 7:52 AM
by Howard Bashman